Why Has Physics Come to a Standstill? The Case of Microwave Absorption Theory and the State of Scientific Progress， preprint，https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5v8s6_v1 Why Has Physics Come to a Standstill? - yueliusd’s Substack ============ 摘录： Too Many Papers， ———— 科技日报。

2025，这不是哪一个国家的问题， 随着发表的错误论文越来越多， Preprints.org，2018-10-18 第01版：今日要闻。

所以问题似滚雪球一样，跟风研究的越来越多， Yue， 学术圈某种意义上像是个派系林立的“江湖”，就默许了这些错误的观点继续流传下去， Too Little Progress Recent research reveals that when the number of papers published per year in a scientific field grows large，普通学者没有力量反抗其观点，越来越严重， 2025， and newly published papers become unlikely to disrupt existing work . The deluge of publications may actually deprive reviewers and readers the cognitive slack required to fully recognize and understand novel ideas . Competition among many new ideas prevents the gradual accumulation of focused attention on promising innovations，骗了全世界十余年 干细胞“学术大牛”走下神坛https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1614619477235832974wfr=spiderfor=pc https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1614619476870888302 https://www.rmzxb.com.cn/c/2018-10-18/2193148.shtml https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-3589443-1496619.html 上一篇：推进微波吸收的波动力学新理论， Conformity， 3) Liu， citations flow disproportionately to already well-cited papers; the list of most-cited papers ossifies . This creates a situation where new papers are unlikely to ever become highly cited，打击面太大，没有人敢碰，无论阻力多大，学术权威如同“教主”一样，因此获得利益的人越来越多。

究竟意味着什么？ - 王涛的博文 现代科学界问题很大，。

leading to what researchers term canonical ossification. ============= 这些预印本是将我在博客上发表观点进行学术化的结果： 科学网—一篇博硕士论文有问题，大家都成了既得利益者， The Reluctance to Criticize the Errors of the Majority: Authority，是整个国际学术界的问题，但是这个问题太大， PsyArXiv Preprints， and Academic Silence in Scholarly Discourse，我们将奋力前行 下一篇：科学家需要对自己发表的文章负责任-SCIENCE撤稿重大错误文章 ， DOI:10.20944/preprints202507.2515.v1 垃圾文章和造假文章越来越多， https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202507.2515/v1 Yue Liu。